ServiceNow is a leading IT Service Management (ITSM) platform designed for complex, global organizations. However, its high cost, long implementation timelines, and reliance on consultants often drive companies to seek alternatives. In this guide, we compare the top ServiceNow alternatives, including InvGate Service Management, highlighting features, pricing, pros, and cons so you can choose the right fit.
TL;DR
Looking for a more practical or cost-effective alternative to ServiceNow? Here’s a quick comparison:
-
InvGate Service Management – Delivers enterprise-grade ITSM with native ITAM integration, no-code workflows, and rapid deployments in weeks, at a fraction of ServiceNow’s cost.
-
Jira Service Management – Best suited for organizations already using Atlassian tools, with tight DevOps alignment, but advanced ITSM features and asset management require Premium/Enterprise plans.
-
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus – A budget-friendly option that includes basic ITAM and offers both cloud and on-premise deployment, though scalability and UX are limited.
-
Freshservice – Known for its clean UI and fast adoption in SMBs and education, but relies heavily on paid add-ons (AI, asset packs, orchestration) that drive up costs as organizations scale.
-
BMC Helix ITSM / Cherwell – A ServiceNow-class enterprise platform with deep ITIL support and configurability, best for large, regulated enterprises — but with comparable cost and implementation times.
Why Companies Look for ServiceNow Alternatives
Organizations often explore alternatives to ServiceNow due to its high total cost of ownership, long implementation cycles, steep learning curve, and complexity that exceeds many companies’ actual needs. While it is a powerful solution for global enterprises, its enterprise-focused design can make it less suitable for mid-sized organizations or those needing faster results.
How Much Does ServiceNow Cost to Implement?
ServiceNow licensing contracts typically begin in the six-figure range annually, but the real expense often lies beyond licensing. Companies frequently face substantial consulting fees for implementation, ongoing customization, and specialized training. These costs can escalate quickly, especially for mid-sized organizations, turning what initially seems like a software investment into a multi-year financial commitment.
Why Do ServiceNow Implementations Take So Long?
Full ServiceNow deployments often require 12 to 36 months, driven by the platform’s comprehensive architecture and need for extensive customization. For businesses operating in fast-moving industries or facing urgent IT challenges, this timeline can delay ROI and hinder competitiveness.
Is ServiceNow Too Complex for Simple Needs?
ServiceNow’s robust workflow automation, integrations, and enterprise-grade capabilities are ideal for large-scale operations. However, for companies with straightforward service desk needs, many of these advanced features go unused. This complexity can create user adoption challenges, as employees navigate tools designed for scenarios far beyond their daily requirements.
How Steep Is the ServiceNow Learning Curve?
Operating ServiceNow typically requires dedicated, certified administrators and ongoing training. Smaller IT teams may struggle to keep up, often relying on costly external consultants. Even seemingly simple adjustments—like creating new workflows or troubleshooting—demand specialized knowledge, stretching already limited IT resources.
When Is ServiceNow the Right Choice?
Despite these challenges, ServiceNow remains a strong fit for multinational corporations and organizations with highly complex service delivery needs. Companies under strict compliance mandates, those requiring extensive cross-departmental workflows, or enterprises managing vast IT environments often justify the investment because of ServiceNow’s scalability and depth.
Key takeaway: ServiceNow excels in environments with very high complexity and global scale, but many organizations achieve better value and faster results with streamlined alternatives.
How to Evaluate ServiceNow Alternatives
When considering alternatives to ServiceNow, organizations should evaluate more than just features. Factors like cost, speed of deployment, usability, scalability, security, and vendor support all play a decisive role in long-term success. Here are the key aspects to keep in mind when comparing solutions:
Implementation Speed
Deployment timelines can determine how quickly you see value. While ServiceNow projects often span 12–36 months, many alternatives can be implemented in under 12 weeks. Faster implementation reduces opportunity costs, minimizes disruption, and accelerates ROI — especially important for organizations responding to urgent IT or compliance needs.
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Licensing fees are only the start. With ServiceNow, additional costs often include consultants, certified administrators, and ongoing customization. A strong alternative should offer transparent, modular pricing and minimize reliance on professional services, allowing IT teams to manage changes internally and keep budgets predictable.
Ease of Use and Adoption
A solution’s effectiveness depends on how easily users embrace it. Complex UIs or overloaded feature sets can slow adoption. Look for alternatives with intuitive interfaces, self-service portals, and searchable knowledge bases that empower end users and reduce help desk tickets. High adoption rates typically translate into faster time-to-value and reduced training overhead.
Configurability Without Consultants
Customization should not require hiring external specialists. Modern ITSM alternatives offer drag-and-drop workflow builders, custom dashboards, and no-code automation tools that IT staff can manage directly. This self-sufficiency reduces costs, increases agility, and ensures IT teams can adapt quickly to new business requirements.
Integration with IT Asset Management (ITAM)
Incidents and requests often involve specific devices, licenses, or infrastructure. Alternatives that include ITAM provide:
-
Automated asset discovery to eliminate blind spots.
-
License management to control software costs and ensure compliance.
-
Depreciation tracking for more accurate financial planning.
-
A unified CMDB linking assets to users and services for faster resolution.
This 360° view strengthens decision-making, speeds up troubleshooting, and supports compliance audits.
Security and Compliance Capabilities
For enterprises, security and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable. Evaluate whether the alternative offers:
-
Certifications like ISO 27001, SOC 2, or FedRAMP.
-
Data residency options for regional compliance (e.g., GDPR).
-
Audit logs and role-based access controls to ensure accountability.
A platform that simplifies compliance reporting and aligns with industry standards can significantly reduce risk.
Scalability for Growth
An effective ServiceNow alternative must support both current and future needs. Assess whether the platform can scale from hundreds to tens of thousands of users without major architectural changes. Key signs of scalability include multi-department service management, multi-language support, and high availability infrastructure.
Migration and Data Portability
Adopting a new ITSM solution often involves migrating tickets, user records, and configuration data. A strong alternative should provide migration tools, APIs, and export options that simplify onboarding while ensuring future flexibility if you decide to switch vendors again. The easier it is to move data in and out, the lower the risk of vendor lock-in.
Vendor Support and Relationship
Support quality can determine long-term satisfaction. ServiceNow’s size sometimes means smaller clients may receive less personalized attention. In contrast, alternatives that offer response times under 4 hours, local language support, and direct access to product teams can make adoption smoother and ongoing operations more reliable.
Roadmap and Innovation Pace
Finally, evaluate how quickly the vendor innovates. ServiceNow’s enterprise update cycles can be slower, while some alternatives release updates every 2–4 weeks, often incorporating customer feedback directly. Choosing a vendor with a transparent roadmap and rapid release cycle ensures your ITSM evolves alongside your business.
Key Takeaway:
Evaluating ServiceNow alternatives requires balancing cost, speed, usability, scalability, compliance, and vendor partnership. The right solution isn’t just about replacing ServiceNow’s functionality — it’s about finding a platform that delivers sustainable value, adapts quickly, and aligns with your organization’s growth trajectory.
Top ServiceNow Alternatives (2025)
In this list, you'll find a side-by-side overview of some of the most widely used ServiceNow alternatives. We’ll go over what they’re known for, which features stand out, and what real users have to say.
InvGate Service Management (Best for Cost-Effective Enterprise ITSM)
InvGate Service Management is a no-code ITSM platform designed for organizations that want enterprise-grade functionality without the high costs and long deployments associated with ServiceNow. With fast implementation timelines measured in weeks (not years), modular pricing, and native integration with IT Asset Management, it offers a powerful yet cost-effective alternative.
It's used by teams at NASA, KPMG, Allianz, and Motorola, often as a more practical alternative to ServiceNow. Where ServiceNow can feel overwhelming, InvGate focuses on usability, faster setup, and solid ITIL alignment without the overhead.
Key Features
-
Integrated ITSM + ITAM: Seamlessly links service tickets with asset data for a complete operational view.
-
No-Code Workflows: Drag-and-drop editor to design and update workflows without consultants.
-
AI Hub: Includes AI-powered ticket responses, predictive analytics, and knowledge article creation.
-
Self-Service Portal & Knowledge Base: Empowers end users to resolve common issues quickly.
-
360° Visibility: Unified dashboards connecting incidents, devices, and users.
Pros
-
Fast ROI: Implementations completed in weeks, accelerating time-to-value.
-
Clean, Intuitive UX: Designed for high adoption across IT and non-IT teams.
-
Recognized by Gartner Customers’ Choice (2025): Rated 4.8/5 in ITSM and praised for usability and support.
Cons
-
Not Ideal for Ultra-Complex Global Processes: While highly flexible, very large multinational corporations with extreme customization needs may still require ServiceNow’s scale.
InvGate Service Management pricing
InvGate uses a modular pricing model that scales with the number of agents and assets, making it adaptable to organizations of different sizes and growth stages. Companies can explore the platform risk-free with a 30-day free trial and even run a tailored Proof of Concept — something that often takes weeks just to scope with ServiceNow. This approach helps de-risk your evaluation, giving you hands-on experience with real processes before committing. For teams comparing alternatives, speaking with an InvGate specialist can further fast-track the assessment and ensure the solution aligns with your specific requirements.
InvGate Enterprise Case Study
A leading retailer with over 100,000 employees deployed InvGate Service Management company-wide in just 12 weeks. The rollout included a unified service catalog and end-to-end ITSM processes, showcasing the platform’s scalability and rapid time-to-value compared to traditional enterprise deployments. To learn how this was achieved — and how it could apply to your organization — contact a specialist for a deep-dive into the full use case.
InvGate Service Management user reviews and ratings
Recognized as a Gartner® Peer Insights™ Customers’ Choice, InvGate Service Management is consistently praised for its ease of use, responsive support, and balance of power and simplicity.
Gartner Peer Insights: 4.8/5
G2: 4.6/5
"Overall, the experience is excellent. I fell the company takes care of every detail. From the very beginning they provide top-level personalized support and are always willing to help us overcome any issues that arise. I can't imagine working at this company today without their products."
User review from Gartner, IT Coordinator
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus (Best for Budget-Conscious IT Teams)
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, part of Zoho’s IT operations suite, is a cost-effective ITSM solution aimed at mid-sized organizations. It offers a combination of service desk functionality and integrated IT Asset Management, with both cloud and on-premise deployment options. Compared to ServiceNow, it is much more affordable but less feature-rich, making it a popular choice for teams prioritizing budget over enterprise-scale capabilities.
Developed by Zoho, ManageEngine Service Desk Plus provides ITSM capabilities alongside integrated asset and project management. It’s available in both cloud and on-premise versions, making it a fit for organizations with infrastructure constraints.
Known for its cost-effectiveness, it covers most core ITIL functions and appeals to IT teams that want control over configuration. Compared to ServiceNow, it requires less investment and is quicker to roll out, though it may lack the depth needed in large enterprise environments. It’s commonly used in education, healthcare, and public sector organizations.
Read more at the ManageEngine vs ServiceNow analysis post.
Strengths:
-
Affordable entry point compared to ServiceNow and other enterprise vendors.
-
Includes IT Asset Management features such as inventory tracking and license management.
-
Offers both cloud and on-premise deployment for flexible environments.
-
Integrates with other ManageEngine tools for monitoring, endpoint management, and security.
Weaknesses:
-
User experience feels dated compared to modern platforms.
-
Customization and workflow automation are limited versus no-code ITSM tools.
-
Scalability challenges in large enterprises with thousands of users.
-
Support quality and documentation can be inconsistent.
ManageEngine pricing details
Pricing:
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is one of the most affordable ITSM options. Pricing is based on agents and chosen modules, with perpetual licenses for on-premise deployments or subscription pricing for cloud. While significantly cheaper than ServiceNow, costs rise with advanced features and integrations.
Has three pricing tiers:
- Standard plan: $13 per technician per month.
- Professional plan: $27 per technician per month.
- Enterprise plan: $67 per technician per month.
Products often have add-on options for extending functionality at a flat rate.
ManageEngine user reviews and ratings
Praised for its value and rich features. Reviews occasionally mention challenges with upgrades and configuration.
“Overall, the software is OK for a service desk or helpdesk tool. It can be very flexible, but requires some coding to really get it working right. Their support team will assist with the coding often times, but they can be difficult to work with. (...) The interface is not as smooth as others I have used, unfortunately.”
User review from Gartner, IT Manager
Jira Service Management (Best for Atlassian Ecosystem Users)
Overview:
Jira Service Management (JSM) extends the popular Jira platform into IT Service Management, making it a natural choice for teams already using Atlassian tools like Jira Software or Confluence. It appeals to organizations looking for tight integration with development workflows, agile project tracking, and DevOps pipelines. However, outside of the Atlassian ecosystem, its ITSM offering can feel fragmented and less mature compared to dedicated platforms.
Read more in the ServiceNow vs FreshService article.
Strengths:
-
Deep integration with Atlassian tools and DevOps pipelines.
-
Flexible issue tracking and agile-oriented workflows.
-
Large marketplace of add-ons for customization.
-
Competitive entry-level pricing for small teams.
Weaknesses:
-
Requires implementation partners for deals under ~$75K, leading to inconsistent onboarding experiences.
-
Asset Management (Assets) is included in Premium/Enterprise but limited — lacks automation, smart tags, and deployment features.
-
The Standard plan is too basic — advanced ITSM (incident, problem, change management), SSO, and reporting require Premium/Enterprise.
-
Complex workflow builder (query-based “if/then/else”) creates usability challenges compared to visual no-code tools.
-
Annual price hikes (5–20% most years, with 2025 increases already announced) make long-term TCO unpredictable.
Jira Service Management pricing
JSM offers tiered cloud pricing (Free, Standard, Premium, Enterprise). While the Standard plan looks affordable, many critical ITSM features are gated behind higher tiers. Premium and Enterprise also introduce usage-based charges (e.g., $0.05/object/month after 50K assets, $0.30/conversation beyond 1,000 virtual agent interactions). Combined with Atlassian’s pattern of yearly price increases, overall costs can escalate quickly.
Jira Service Management user reviews and ratings
Users appreciate the flexibility and integrations but mention limitations for traditional ITSM use unless heavily customized.
- Gartner Peer Reviews score: 4.5
- G2 score: 4.2
"The interface is straightforward, making it simple for everyone to find what they need without getting lost. Setting up workflows and customizations can be time-consuming and sometimes confusing. Sometimes I feel like it requires a developer to do that."
User review from G2, Project administrator
BMC Helix / Cherwell (Best for Large Enterprises Beyond ServiceNow)
BMC Helix (formerly Remedy) and Cherwell are long-standing enterprise ITSM platforms positioned as ServiceNow competitors for large, complex organizations. They offer extensive configurability and deep ITIL alignment, serving industries with strict compliance and security requirements. While not as widely recognized in modern SMB contexts, they remain strong contenders for enterprises seeking alternatives to ServiceNow’s global deployments.
For more deep-dive comparison check our ServiceNow vs BMC Helix / Cherwell article
Strengths:
-
Mature ITSM capabilities with comprehensive ITIL process support.
-
Strong in automation, service modeling, and compliance features.
-
Highly configurable to fit unique enterprise workflows.
-
Proven track record with large enterprises in regulated sectors (finance, healthcare, government).
Weaknesses:
-
High cost comparable to ServiceNow, making it unsuitable for SMBs.
-
Lengthy implementations and resource-intensive customization.
-
Older user interface and steeper learning curve than newer ITSM tools.
-
Requires dedicated administrators or consultants for ongoing management.
Pricing:
BMC Helix and Cherwell do not publish pricing; contracts are enterprise-level and typically tailored to each customer. Costs are generally in line with ServiceNow, with high total cost of ownership.
BMC Helix user reviews and ratings
Reviews praise its depth and reliability, but they also highlight the complexity of setup and maintenance and its higher price compared to other options.
- Gartner Peer Reviews score: 4.3
- G2 score: 3.7
"We have found a friendly user interface, with simple navigation over the old Remedy style. Very good customer support, and also a good internal knowledge module and client interface. If the product is negotiated outside a bundle of products, the costs can be expensive. We have found some integration issues related to external monitoring software and issue management. Implementation costs can also be quite expensive, depending on the number of desired integrations."
User review from Gartner, SysAdmin
Freshservice (Best for SMBs and Education)
Freshservice, developed by Freshworks, is a cloud-based ITSM tool aimed at small and mid-sized organizations. While ServiceNow targets multinational enterprises with highly complex requirements, Freshservice positions itself at the other end of the spectrum — prioritizing simplicity, quick adoption, and affordability. Its interface is modern and intuitive, making it popular among startups, SMBs, and educational institutions that need ITSM basics without the overhead of an enterprise platform.
Strengths:
-
-
Fast deployment and minimal training compared to ServiceNow’s lengthy rollouts.
-
Clean, user-friendly interface aligned with ITIL processes out of the box.
-
Attractive entry-level pricing for small IT teams.
-
Flexible add-ons for project management and SaaS management, which can extend functionality.
-
Well-suited for organizations with straightforward service management needs.
-
Weaknesses:
-
-
Limited scalability: Freshservice struggles to support the complexity that ServiceNow handles, making it less suitable for large enterprises.
-
Customer support challenges, with reports of slow responses and limited resolution capabilities.
-
Add-on heavy pricing: AI, orchestration, and advanced ITAM are separate charges, making total cost less predictable as needs expand.
-
Rarely offers Proof of Concept opportunities, whereas large-scale ServiceNow deployments often require extensive validation before purchase.
-
Weaker automation and asset management compared to both ServiceNow and specialized ITSM/ITAM platforms.
-
Offshore support model creates time zone and responsiveness issues for many enterprise clients.
-
Pricing:
Freshservice has four main pricing tiers (billed annually):
-
Starter: ~$19 per agent/month – basic ITSM (incident, knowledge base, workflow automation) without ITAM F
-
Growth: ~$49 per agent/month – adds service catalog, asset management (with 100 assets included), onboarding workflows, and 2,000 orchestration transactions per month
-
Pro: ~$99 per agent/month – includes problem/change/release management, analytics, project & contract management, and 5,000 orchestration transactions
-
Enterprise: Custom–tailored pricing (around $109+/agent/month) with AI agents, sandbox environment, audit logs, and 20,000 orchestration transactions
Notable Add-ons:
-
Assets Pack: $75/month for 500 assets (or $1,500/month for unlimited)
-
Freddy AI Copilot: $29/agent/month (annual billing) on Pro and Enterprise
-
Orchestration Transaction Pack, Advanced Discovery, Project Management, SaaS Management, and Business Agents are extra-cost modules
Note on Cost Escalation:
While Freshservice starts affordably, costs can grow quickly as more features are needed—making overall pricing less predictable than initial expectations.
Pricing Disclaimer: The pricing details provided are based on publicly available online sources and may vary depending on region, plan updates, or promotional offers. We recommend verifying directly with the vendor for the most accurate and up-to-date information.
FAQs About ServiceNow Alternatives
What is the best alternative to ServiceNow for mid-sized enterprises?
InvGate Service Management is often the best fit for mid-sized enterprises due to its balance of enterprise-grade functionality, faster deployment timelines, and lower total cost of ownership (TCO).
Unlike ServiceNow, which is designed for large multinationals with highly complex requirements, InvGate offers a more accessible solution that still includes ITIL-aligned processes, no-code workflows, AI capabilities, and native IT Asset Management integration. Mid-sized organizations benefit from faster time-to-value (deployments in weeks rather than years) and pricing that scales to their needs without excessive consulting overhead.
How much cheaper are ServiceNow alternatives?
ServiceNow contracts typically range from $250K to over $1M annually, depending on the modules and consulting required. Alternatives like InvGate, ManageEngine, or Freshservice are often 60–70% less expensive.
The difference comes not only from licensing fees but also from reduced dependency on third-party consultants, faster implementations, and more transparent pricing models. For many companies, the long-term savings extend beyond licensing to include lower training costs, simpler administration, and predictable budgeting.
How long does it take to implement a ServiceNow alternative?
-
ServiceNow: 12–36 months
-
InvGate Service Management: <12 weeks
-
Freshservice: A few weeks
-
Jira Service Management: Varies, depending on Atlassian ecosystem setup and required add-ons
Implementation speed is often a decisive factor. While ServiceNow rollouts are lengthy due to customization and scale, alternatives like InvGate or Freshservice are designed for faster adoption with pre-configured workflows and no-code customization. This allows IT teams to realize value sooner and reduce the opportunity cost of delayed transformation.
Which ServiceNow alternative offers ITAM + ITSM in one platform?
InvGate Service Management + InvGate Asset Management provide native integration between IT Service Management and IT Asset Management for a complete IT operations view.
This integration allows service tickets to be directly linked to devices, software, and users, giving IT teams full visibility of their environment. Benefits include faster incident resolution, better compliance management, and more accurate financial tracking across the IT lifecycle. Most competitors — including ServiceNow, Jira, and Freshservice — require separate modules or third-party integrations for ITAM, which adds complexity and cost.
How to choose a ServiceNow competitor
Start by narrowing down what you actually need from an ITSM tool. ServiceNow covers a wide range of use cases, but not every team needs that level of complexity. If you're mainly handling incidents, requests, and Change Management, you might not need the extra modules that come with a platform built for enterprise-wide workflow automation.
Consider your deployment needs. Cloud-only tools are easier to get up and running. Others offer both cloud and on-premise options, which are useful if you have compliance requirements or infrastructure preferences.
Usability is another key factor. Some alternatives focus on simplifying configuration and daily use, while others require more time and expertise to fully set up. Look at how much internal support you'll need for setup, training, and maintenance.
Finally, compare integration options. Check how easily your ITSM solution can connect with your current tech stack. Choosing a tool that fits your environment saves time and prevents workarounds later.
To structure your evaluation, consider using an ITSM RFP (Request for Proposal). It’s a document that outlines your requirements, helping vendors respond with clear answers on how their solution fits your needs. If you need a starting point, check out this ITSM RFP free template!
Conclusion: Choosing the Right ServiceNow Alternative
ServiceNow remains a powerful option for very large, complex global enterprises with the scale, budgets, and resources to manage its extensive capabilities. However, for many organizations, the cost, complexity, and lengthy implementations make it less than ideal.
That’s where alternatives come in. Platforms like InvGate Service Management offer a compelling balance of enterprise-grade functionality, faster ROI, and greater simplicity — without the heavy consulting burden or unpredictable pricing of ServiceNow. Other options like Jira Service Management, Freshservice, and ManageEngine may also fit specific needs, but InvGate stands out for its native ITAM + ITSM integration, intuitive no-code workflows, and rapid deployment times.
👉 Ready to see if InvGate is the right fit for your organization?
Request our 30-day free trial or book a meeting with our experts.
Methodology Behind This ServiceNow Alternative Analysis
This analysis was developed by a team of ITSM industry analysts within our company’s Market Intelligence unit. It draws on a combination of win/loss interviews, verified online reviews, and independent analyst reports, with the goal of maintaining the highest possible level of objectivity. Should you find any aspect of this information to be inaccurate or incomplete, we welcome your contributions to further enrich the study and encourage you to share feedback with us through our Contact form.
